Number 10 Responds

The office of the Prime Minister has given a response to a recent petition regarding light pollution.

I've had a quick scan of the response and, at the moment, I'm unsure if it's a good thing, bad thing or somewhere in the middle. I should probably take a careful look at the content of the response and compare it with the information I can find on the CfDS website.

1 comment:

Paul Sutherland said...

My first impression was that it was a classic case of stating the bleeding obvious which also gave the impression that light pollution is being addressed, whereas only light nuisance is covered by law - e.g. shining light directly into someone's bedroom so they can't sleep.