tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14895585.post5332507696253125505..comments2024-01-10T21:09:40.742+00:00Comments on davep's astronomy: Floodlighting Petition ResponseDave Pearsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07460881163553899351noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14895585.post-4069743186904742692008-01-24T18:45:00.000+00:002008-01-24T18:45:00.000+00:00I too had the rather pathetic non entity of a repl...I too had the rather pathetic non entity of a reply to the petition. Still, onwards and upwards as they say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14895585.post-62524465419404546722008-01-21T21:28:00.000+00:002008-01-21T21:28:00.000+00:00So, that's a "no" then, is it?It's not really surp...So, that's a "no" then, is it?<BR/><BR/>It's not really surprising that they wouldn't go for an all-out ban but it is a pity they were not a bit more positive about the general idea. <BR/><BR/>You'd also hope they'd at least get somebody who knows the difference between "its" and "it's" to check the response.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com